Raw Jute Prices Plunge 50% in Bengal in Three Weeks, Rattling Mills and Farmers
TD-5 benchmark rates crashed from ₹18,300 to ₹9,100 per quintal in barely three weeks, triggering a dispute between IJMA and the Jute Balers' Association over whether published quotations reflect real market trades.
The short answer
Raw jute prices in West Bengal have nearly halved since early July, with the TD-5 benchmark falling from ₹18,300 to ₹9,100 per quintal between July 9 and August 1. The Indian Jute Mills Association has formally challenged the Jute Balers' Association's daily price quotations, alleging they do not reflect actual transaction prices. Because these quotations feed directly into the government's fair-price formula for jute gunny bags, the dispute has significant implications for farmers, mills, and public procurement.
The crash
TD-5 Benchmark Loses Over ₹9,000 in Three Weeks
According to price bulletins issued by the Jute Balers' Association (JBA), the benchmark rate for TD-5 grade raw jute (South Bengal) dropped from ₹18,300 per quintal on July 9 to ₹9,100 by August 1 — a fall of more than ₹9,000 in roughly three weeks.
What makes the scale of the decline especially striking, according to industry observers, is its timing: the crash preceded the full arrival of new-crop jute at mandis, meaning the supply-side pressure typically associated with harvest-season price falls cannot fully explain the movement.
Industry veteran and former Indian Jute Mills Association (IJMA) chairman Sanjay Kajaria described it as "an extraordinary crash," calling for a transaction-based investigation into how prices moved so sharply before adequate new-crop volumes entered the market.
The dispute
IJMA Alleges JBA Quotations Don't Reflect Real Trades
In a formal letter to JBA chairman Madan Gopal Maheshwari dated July 14, IJMA alleged that the daily quotations published by the JBA were "not reflective of the actual price in market trades." Mills, the association said, were being compelled to pay prices higher than the published rates for ready-delivery contracts — and even then, actual deliveries were frequently falling short.
The charge goes beyond a bookkeeping disagreement. IJMA pointed out that JBA quotations serve as the primary reference for the jute commissioner's office when computing the raw jute cost component in the monthly fair-price formula for government jute gunny bags. Since raw jute accounts for nearly two-thirds of total manufacturing cost, any systematic distortion in quoted rates directly undermines the credibility and accuracy of that price-fixation mechanism — with consequences for both mills and the government's packaging procurement budget.
This is an extraordinary crash that raises serious questions before farmers, jute mills and the government's packaging system. The industry needs a transaction-based investigation into how prices have moved this way, especially even before adequate arrivals of the new crop hit the market.
The rebuttal
JBA Defends Its 'Like-for-Like' Methodology
Responding on July 16, JBA chairman Maheshwari defended the association's price-setting process, explaining that a five-member quotations committee records rates submitted by participating mills on each working day. The committee evaluates these on a "like-for-like basis," applying a standardised ready-delivery window of seven to ten days.
Quotations that involve non-standard delivery timelines or atypical payment terms are excluded from the final benchmark to maintain comparability, Maheshwari said. He added that the methodology has been "consistently followed" over the years and that the published quotation is designed to offer "a fair, objective and consistent indication of the prevailing market for comparable ready-delivery transactions."
However, IJMA's objection — that mills are routinely transacting above the published rate — suggests the committee may not be capturing the full range of real-market bids, a gap the industry is now pressing to have independently examined.
The policy stakes
Price Benchmarks That Drive Government Gunny Bag Rates Are Under Scrutiny
The controversy carries significant policy weight because government jute gunny bags — used for packaging foodgrains under mandatory jute-packaging norms — are priced monthly by the jute commissioner's office using JBA quotations as a core input.
Raw jute constitutes nearly two-thirds of total manufacturing cost, meaning even moderate distortions in quoted benchmarks translate into material mispricing of government contracts. If quotations persistently lag real transaction prices, mills face a cost squeeze; if they overshoot, the government overpays.
The current episode — a near-halving of the benchmark in three weeks, disputed by mills on the ground — highlights structural questions about whether a committee-based, self-reported quotation system is robust enough to serve as the backbone of a government price-fixation mechanism. Industry voices, including Kajaria, are now calling for a transaction-data-driven review before the pricing anomaly is baked further into the system.
Why it matters
Raw jute accounts for nearly two-thirds of jute-bag manufacturing costs, and the JBA's daily quotations are the primary input the jute commissioner's office uses to fix the monthly fair price of government packaging material — making the credibility of those benchmarks a policy issue, not just a trade dispute. A near-50% price collapse in three weeks, occurring even before new-crop arrivals have fully reached the market, raises urgent questions about price discovery and farmer returns. Policymakers and the jute commissioner's office should demand a transaction-based audit of quotation methodology before the next monthly fair-price revision. Jute farmers in West Bengal, already exposed to volatile incomes, stand to lose most if distorted benchmarks permanently depress the reference rates used for government procurement pricing.
Frequently asked
- By how much have raw jute prices fallen in West Bengal, and over what period?
- According to JBA price bulletins, the TD-5 benchmark rate for South Bengal raw jute fell from ₹18,300 per quintal on July 9 to ₹9,100 on August 1 — a decline of over ₹9,000, or nearly 50%, in about three weeks.
- Why does the JBA's daily price quotation matter for the government?
- The jute commissioner's office uses JBA quotations as the primary reference to determine the raw jute cost component when fixing the monthly fair price of government jute gunny bags. Since raw jute accounts for nearly two-thirds of total manufacturing cost, any distortion in these quotations affects the accuracy and credibility of government procurement pricing.
- What is IJMA's specific complaint about JBA quotations?
- In a July 14 letter to JBA chairman Madan Gopal Maheshwari, IJMA alleged that published JBA quotations were not reflective of actual market trade prices. The association said mills were compelled to pay higher prices than the published rates for ready-delivery contracts and that deliveries were still falling short.
- How does the JBA say it calculates its benchmark quotation?
- JBA chairman Maheshwari explained that a five-member quotations committee records rates submitted by participating mills each working day and assesses them on a like-for-like basis using a standard ready-delivery period of seven to ten days. Quotations with non-standard delivery or payment terms are excluded from the benchmark.
Source
This report summarises and analyses coverage from The Hindu BusinessLine — Agri Business. The analysis and India context are IndianAgri's own.