What a Tonne of Biomass Pellets Costs in Electricity
Across a pellet line's working life the electricity costs several times what the machines cost, and unlike your margin it does not fall when pellet prices do. The number is recoverable from specification tables anyone can read — so here is the arithmetic, and the one item it excludes.

The short answer
Dividing published rated power by published rated output across a shredder, hammer mill and pellet mill puts a biomass pellet line at roughly 100 to 165 kWh per tonne, or about ₹700 to ₹1,200 of electricity at Indian industrial tariffs of ₹7 to ₹9 a unit. The pellet mill accounts for half to two-thirds of it, and its energy per tonne barely improves with machine size — 55 to 94 kWh/t across a 90 kW to 250 kW range. These are ceilings, not measurements: motors are sized for worst-case load and VFD-equipped lines draw less at part load. The figure excludes drying, which on wet feedstock is usually the largest energy item in the plant and is normally supplied as heat from burning biomass rather than as metered electricity.
The gap
Every quote tells you the price. None of them tells you the bill
Ask for a pellet plant quotation in India and you will get one within the day. Machine price, motor rating, rated tonnes per hour, delivery schedule, sometimes a payback estimate built on numbers the supplier chose.
What almost nobody gives you is the electricity bill. Yet across a pellet line's working life the power it draws will cost several times what the machines cost, and it is the one number that decides whether a plant survives a bad pellet price — because it does not fall when your margin does.
The figure is recoverable, though. Manufacturers publish rated motor power and rated output for every model, and dividing one by the other gives specific energy — kilowatt-hours per tonne. That division gives a ceiling, not a measurement, and the distinction matters enough that it is repeated beside every number below. Motors are sized for the worst moment a machine will ever have, not for its normal one, and lines of this class now ship with variable-frequency drives that cut the draw at part load.
Still, a ceiling you can calculate beats a number nobody will give you. Here is the arithmetic, worked on one manufacturer's published table, with the parts you have to fill in yourself marked clearly.
The arithmetic
Three machines stand between a bale and a pellet
A pelletising line is not one machine. Residue arrives too coarse and too loose to press, so it goes through a shredder, then a hammer mill, and only then the pellet mill. Each stage has its own nameplate, and each one draws power on every tonne that passes.
Taking the published ratings of one Indian manufacturer's line — Trio Renewable Engineering, whose full specification tables are online — and dividing rated kW by rated TPH:
| Stage | Rated power | Rated output | Ceiling on energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shredder (TS5 to TS10HD) | 110–180 kW | 5–10 TPH | 15–22 kWh/t |
| Hammer mill (75–160 kW) | 93–197 kW | 2–6 TPH | 31–47 kWh/t |
| Pellet mill (90–250 kW) | 94–255 kW | 1–4 TPH | 55–94 kWh/t |
Power figures include the ancillaries the manufacturer lists against each machine — the ID fan on the hammer mill, and the kickout motor, oil pump, grease pump and mini cyclone on the pellet mill. People costing a plant routinely forget those and they are not trivial: the hammer mill's induced-draught fan alone is 18.5 to 37 kW, a fifth to a quarter of the mill it serves.
Two things fall out of the table immediately. The pellet mill is the expensive stage, accounting for roughly half to two-thirds of the line's electricity. And the shredder, which looks intimidating at 180 kW, is the cheapest thing on the site per tonne, because it moves material fast.
The finding
A bigger pellet mill is not a cheaper one
The instinctive assumption — buy larger, run more efficiently — does not survive the arithmetic. Work through the pellet mills one by one, rated power over rated output:
| Model | Rated power incl. ancillaries | Rated output | Ceiling on energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 560-90 | 93.9 kW | 1–1.5 TPH | 63–94 kWh/t |
| 560-132 | 135.9 kW | 1.5–2 TPH | 68–91 kWh/t |
| 560-160 | 163.9 kW | 2–2.5 TPH | 66–82 kWh/t |
| 700-160 | 163.9 kW | 2.5–3 TPH | 55–66 kWh/t |
| 850-250 | 254.7 kW | 3.5–4 TPH | 64–73 kWh/t |
Across a range where installed power nearly triples, the energy ceiling per tonne moves only between roughly 55 and 94 kWh — and the largest machine on the list is not the most efficient one. The best ratio belongs to the 700-160, a mid-sized mill with a larger die on the same motor as the model below it.
That is not a quirk of one catalogue. Pelletising energy is set by what the material does inside the die — friction, compression, the heat that softens the lignin and binds the pellet — and that physics does not care how big the machine around it is. Scale buys you fewer operators per tonne, fewer shifts and headroom to grow. It does not buy you cheaper electricity per tonne. Anyone being sold a larger mill on an efficiency argument should ask to see this division done on the actual models being compared.
The total
About ₹700 to ₹1,200 a tonne, before anything gets dried
Add the three stages at their rated ceilings and a line runs roughly 100 to 165 kWh per tonne of pellets. Derate for the fact that motors rarely sit at rated load and that a VFD trims the rest, and a working expectation of 85 to 135 kWh/t is reasonable for a well-fed line — though only a meter on your own plant settles it.
Industrial tariffs in India broadly sit in the ₹7 to ₹9 per unit range depending on state, voltage level and time of day, and they move every tariff order, so re-quote from your own DISCOM rather than trusting that band. At ₹8, the middle of it:
- A tonne of pellets carries roughly ₹700 to ₹1,200 of electricity.
- A 1 TPH line running 20 hours a day for 25 days makes about 500 tonnes a month — around ₹4.8 lakh a month in energy at 120 kWh/t.
- Every 10 kWh/t you shave is worth about ₹80 a tonne, or ₹40,000 a month on that same line.
Then there is the part of the bill that has nothing to do with production. A line of this size needs a connected load in the region of 300 kW, which means an HT connection and demand charges billed on sanctioned capacity whether the plant runs or not. A plant that idles half the month pays those in full, which is why utilisation, not efficiency, is usually the first thing that kills a small pellet operation. Ask your DISCOM what the demand charge is per kVA per month before you size the connection, and read it as a fixed cost, not a variable one.
For readers who want the method rather than the answer, this is the same arithmetic we ran on what a power weeder actually costs to run per acre — build the number from components you can verify, and mark the ones you cannot.
Planning a pellet line?Tell us your feedstock and tonnage — we will size the lineSend the desk your feedstock, the tonnes an hour you are aiming at and your state. You get back the machine sizes that actually fit, the power draw to plan the connection around, and who supplies them.Get a plant costingWhatsApp +91 92093 28498
The omission
The largest energy item is not on the nameplate at all
Everything above is the electricity. It is not the energy.
A pellet die needs feedstock at roughly 10 to 15% moisture. Below that the material will not bind and you get fines; above it, steam in the die and pellets that crumble in the bag. Almost nothing arrives in that window. Sawdust from a working mill might; paddy straw off a field, bagasse from a crushing season and freshly chipped wood certainly do not.
Closing that gap means drying, and drying is usually the biggest energy consumer in a pellet plant — frequently more than the pelletising itself. It also mostly does not appear on an electricity bill, because the heat generally comes from a biomass furnace burning residue, or in many cases burning some of the plant's own pellets. The cost lands as feedstock consumed rather than units metered, which is exactly why it goes missing from comparisons.
So the honest form of the headline number is this: 100 to 165 kWh per tonne is what the machines draw, on a manufacturer's own ratings, assuming the material is already dry enough to press. Any project report quoting a specific energy figure without saying where drying sits in it is either describing dry sawdust or is incomplete. When you are handed one, that is the first question to ask.
The alternative
The same straw has more than one destination
It is worth stepping back from the die for a moment, because a pellet plant is one answer to a question — what to do with several tonnes of residue an hour — and it is not automatically the best one for a given field, feedstock or balance sheet.
The same paddy straw can be pyrolysed rather than pressed, which turns it into biochar and a soil amendment with a durable carbon story attached; we have written about what that does to a field in its first season and about the residue-fire problem it is meant to solve. Our sister site India Biochar works on that route specifically, including the carbon-removal side of it.
And whichever route the residue takes, the carbon arithmetic underneath it is increasingly monetisable in its own right — soil carbon, agroforestry, methane reduction in rice — which is the ground AgriCarbon Credits covers, from measurement and verification through to who actually pays.
The reason to raise it here is arithmetic, not advocacy. A tonne of residue has a pellet value, a biochar value and possibly a carbon value, and they are not the same number in every state or every season. Sugarcane trash is the clearest illustration — we looked at the scale of what is currently burned or left — and anyone about to spend a crore on a pelletising line should have priced at least the other two before signing.
Next
What we are working on, and what to ask us
We are working through this category post by post — sizing the front end, choosing a die diameter, what paddy straw does to a line built for sawdust, what the subsidy routes actually pay, and who is buying the output.
If you are costing a plant and hit a number you cannot source, the desk will help you find it. Write to us through the contact page or on WhatsApp with your feedstock, your target tonnage and your state. Questions that arrive that way also decide what gets commissioned next, so the answer comes back to you either way.
Why it matters
Pellet plants are being promoted hard to Indian farmers, FPOs and small industrialists as the answer to crop residue, and the material sold alongside them is almost entirely machine price and rated tonnage. Running cost decides whether the plant is still operating in year three, and electricity is its largest controllable line item — one that does not shrink when the pellet price falls. A buyer who can divide rated kW by rated TPH can sanity-check any project report put in front of them, spot the drying load that is missing from most of them, and size an electricity connection whose demand charges will be billed whether the line runs or not.
Frequently asked
How much electricity does it take to make one tonne of biomass pellets?
Working from published nameplate ratings across a shredder, hammer mill and pellet mill, the ceiling is roughly 100 to 165 kWh per tonne, of which the pellet mill alone accounts for about 55 to 94 kWh. That is rated power divided by rated output, so it is an upper bound rather than a measurement — motors are sized for worst-case load and VFD-equipped lines draw less at part load. A realistic working expectation is 85 to 135 kWh/t. Critically, this excludes drying, which on wet feedstock is usually the largest energy item in the plant and is normally supplied as heat from a biomass furnace rather than as metered electricity.
What does that cost in rupees per tonne?
At Indian industrial tariffs of roughly ₹7 to ₹9 per unit, electricity works out to about ₹700 to ₹1,200 per tonne of pellets. A 1 TPH line running 20 hours a day for 25 days a month produces around 500 tonnes and would draw roughly ₹4.8 lakh of power a month at 120 kWh/t and ₹8 a unit. Tariffs vary by state, voltage level and time of day and change with every tariff order, so re-quote from your own DISCOM. Separately, a line of this size needs an HT connection with demand charges billed on sanctioned load whether you run or not.
Does a bigger pellet machine use less power per tonne?
Barely. Across one manufacturer's published range from 90 kW to 250 kW, the energy ceiling per tonne moves only between about 55 and 94 kWh, and the largest mill in the range is not the most efficient. Pelletising energy is governed by friction and compression inside the die, which does not scale with machine size. Buying larger buys throughput, fewer operators per tonne and headroom — not cheaper electricity per tonne. Treat an efficiency claim made for a bigger mill as something to verify by dividing rated power by rated output on both models.
Which stage of a pellet line uses the most power?
The pellet mill, by a distance — roughly half to two-thirds of the line's electricity. The hammer mill is next at about 31 to 47 kWh per tonne including its induced-draught fan, which is itself 18.5 to 37 kW and frequently left out of cost estimates. The shredder is the cheapest stage per tonne, at roughly 15 to 22 kWh, because although its motors are large it moves material quickly. Drying, where the feedstock needs it, can exceed all three but usually burns biomass rather than electricity.
Why does feedstock moisture matter so much to pellet plant costs?
A die needs material at roughly 10 to 15% moisture. Too dry and it will not bind, producing fines; too wet and steam forms in the die and the pellets crumble later. Sawdust from a working mill may arrive in that window, but paddy straw, bagasse and fresh wood chips do not, so they must be dried first. That drying is typically the plant's largest energy consumer and is usually fuelled by burning residue or some of the plant's own pellets, so it shows up as feedstock consumed rather than on the electricity bill — which is how it disappears from project reports.
Source
- Trio Renewable Engineering — vertical ring die pellet mill specifications (TRIO 560 / 700 / 850)
- Trio Renewable Engineering — shredder specifications (TRIO TS5 / TS10 / TS10HD)
- Trio Renewable Engineering — hammer mill specifications (TRIO 75X100 / 80X130)
Every energy figure in this article is rated motor power divided by rated output from one manufacturer's published specification tables (Trio Renewable Engineering, read 11 September 2026), and is therefore an upper bound on specific energy rather than a measured consumption. Motors are sized for worst-case load and the models cited ship with variable-frequency drives, so actual draw at part load is lower; the 85–135 kWh/t working range offered in the text is a derated estimate, not a measurement, and only a meter on a given plant settles it. The output figures carry the manufacturer's own asterisk, meaning they are feedstock- and condition-dependent. One vendor's table is not the market: the arithmetic is presented as a method readers can repeat on any supplier's numbers, and no supplier is recommended. The ₹7–9 per unit industrial tariff band and the resulting rupee figures are indicative for September 2026 and will date quickly — they vary by state, voltage level and time of day and change with each tariff order. Drying energy is excluded throughout and the article says so repeatedly; no figure is offered for it because it depends entirely on incoming moisture and furnace design. Demand charges are described qualitatively rather than quantified, as they are set per DISCOM.


